Calvin’s Men’s Basketball roster was released on the school’s official athletic website today, giving us our first glimpse of the 2014-15 Knights.
Regarding the Roster,
Who is Not on It
It comes as no surprise – but it is still perhaps worth
spending a few words here – that the three players from last year’s roster who
had exhausted their NCAA eligibility are not found on this year’s version of
said roster. These players are, of course, Tyler Kruis, Mickey DeVries, and
Jordan Mast.
The type of hard-hitting analysis that can only be found on
the electronic pages of Forever Faithful suggests that replacing Kruis and
DeVries will be a difficult endeavor. Kruis was a very deserving MVP last year
and DeVries only missed All-MIAA status due to what must be deemed massive
oversight on the part of the league’s coaches.
DeVries didn’t shoot a lot – he took less than 20% of the
team’s shots while on the floor – but he was super-efficient when he did try to
score, racking up 1.22 points per
weighted shot which put him behind only Jordan Brink among players
receiving double-digit minutes per game (Kruis was right behind at 1.20 PPWS
while shouldering the largest shooting load of any Calvin player). Also,
rebounding.
Jordan Mast – perhaps
the most efficient shooter we’ve seen – will also be missed. Not because he
contributed something irreplaceable to last year’s squad, but because he
represented incredible team depth. He was a known quantity with a competent set
of skills – a rotation-quality player for a league championship team. That he
was pushed aside for playing time was less to do with a particular deficiency
in his game and more to do with the wealth of talent on the roster.
The only unexpected omission is Junior forward B.J. Van Loo.
Some sleuthing (thanks to a hot internet tip) reveals that he has transferred back
to Grace Bible College. Van Loo was almost surely going to be a rotation
player, so, while he wasn’t a particularly efficient scorer or above-average
defender, he was a known quantity with a reliable set of skills – a roughly
average MIAA player – which makes him a valuable asset that will be missed.
Average never gets enough credit.
Regarding the Roster,
Who is on It
It’s tough to lose a league MVP, but for this year’s Calvin
team that might be made easier by the presence of Jordan Brink, who’s likely
the odds-on favorite to win the award this year. Having the best player in the
league is a good thing. Again, that’s the hard-hitting analysis that you can
only find here.
Brink is the rare player who can shoulder a tremendous
shooting load and still hit a high percentage of shots. How efficient is he? If
Caleb Veldhouse made field goals and free throws at the same rate as Brink, he
would have added 278 points to his career total (or about 2.5 points per game).
And he was a guy who already scored nearly 15 points per game.
Joining Brink in the starting backcourt will likely be
Austin Parks. Parks spent much of the year coming off the bench, though he did
start in the MIAA Championship Game (in place of Tyler Dykstra) as Calvin
attempted (and succeeded) in matching up with Hope’s smaller, quicker lineup.
He’s an exciting player who acquitted himself well in his first year of real
action.
Jordan Daley should also return to the starting lineup, but
I’m betting on him to shift to more of a 2/3 wing role. Like the aforementioned
MIAA Championship contest, he’ll likely start at the nominal small forward
position. Daley was a real treat to watch last year as a Sophomore; he blossomed
into a rather efficient scorer and was a lockdown defender by season’s end. The
Washington U. broadcasters could not stop raving about his defense in last
year’s NCAA Tournament.
Tyler Dykstra will mark his third year as a member of
Calvin’s starting lineup. He’s a player we’re going to miss sorely after this
season because he’s easy to take for granted. He’s not flashy unless he’s
blocking a shot, and Calvin doesn’t run the offense through him, but at the end
of the day he’s filled up the stat sheet and contributed in every facet of the
game. With Kruis out of the middle
(where he was very effective), it’s possible we see more room open up for
Dykstra to operate offensively.
Dan Stout should slide into the starting spot to replace
Kruis. He’s been a solid role player for three seasons now, and his job this
year is to take advantage of the opportunities that come. Calvin’s offense is
going to be based on the perimeter, so Dan’s going to have the opportunity to
do what he’s done so well off the bench: rebound, draw fouls, and knock down
his shots from the line.
The sixth man right now looks like Sophomore Brad Visser. He
was an exciting scorer who took on an ever expanding role as the season went
on. Brad didn’t appear to lack for confidence as a freshman – he wasn’t afraid
to hoist a shot – and that wasn’t a bad thing because he made a lot of them.
He’ll probably need to be a bit more discerning with his selection, but he’s a
guy who should always have the green light to launch an open three.
Also in the rotation will likely be Senior guard/forward
T.J. Huizenga. Huizenga isn’t going to be a scorer, but he’s going to defend,
rebound, hustle, and avoid mistakes. He’s a benchmark player. You’re not afraid
to put him in the game, but if others are pushing him for playing time, it
means you have a good team.
This is the exact point in the process where the thinking
shifts from “dang, this is a pretty solid team” to “dang, who else is going to
play?” Every player with notable varsity playing time has been named, and we’ve
only named seven of the 14 players. This is concerning because of the unknown
factor, but it’s also exciting because of the youth factor. Eight of the 14
players on the roster are underclassmen which isn’t a problem if they’re good.
Guard Danny Leach and big Michael Welch both split time
between Varsity and JV last year and played in mop-up minutes with the big
club. Of the two Welch is the more likely one to see a significant role
increase (due to the experience mix between bigs and smalls on the roster), but
both have upside and promise.
Joining them in the Sophomore ranks are Nick Kronemeyer and
Seth Van Engen, both up from the JV squad. I must admit to knowing almost
nothing about either one, except that they both also played football in high school.
Also in the ranks of the unknown are three freshmen: Connor
VanderBrug, Tony Canonie, and Nick Goeglein. Of the three I’ve only received
second hand reports on VanderBrug, but excitement surrounding him is
exceedingly high.
Depth Chart
Depth chart by class looks like (with positions loosely assigned):
Guessing at the playing rotation is difficult right now with so many new faces so I can guess nothing better than:
Depth chart by class looks like (with positions loosely assigned):
SR | JR | SO | FR | |
---|---|---|---|---|
G | Jordan Brink | Austin Parks | Nick Kronemeyer | |
G | Danny Leach | Tony Canonie | ||
G/F | TJ Huizenga | Jordan Daley | Brad Visser | |
F | Tyler Dykstra | Seth VanEngen | Connor VanderBrug | |
C | Daniel Stout | Michael Welch | Nick Goeglein |
Guessing at the playing rotation is difficult right now with so many new faces so I can guess nothing better than:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
G | Austin Parks | Danny Leach | Nick Kronemeyer | |
G | Jordan Brink | Brad Visser | Tony Canonie | |
G/F | Jordan Daley | TJ Huizenga | ||
F | Tyler Dykstra | Connor VanderBrug | Seth VanEngen | |
C | Dan Stout | Michael Welch | Nick Goeglein |
Uninformative, I know. I hate projecting freshmen into rotation roles, but I've read enough good things about VanderBrug to know that's not out of the question. But even with him I have eight rotation spots penciled in which means at least one of the remaining six should see major minutes, if not two more.
If it comes down to it, Parks, Brink, Daley, Visser, and Huizenga could lock down the 1-3 positions (though there's room for another player or two if they force their way in), but the Knights will certainly be in need of another 4/5 in the mix. I'll always give the nod to the guy who's been around (which is Welch), but that's nothing more than a guess.